FRIDA

 

Home
Up
BUZZMIX WHO?
MUSIC
RANT & RAVE!
FEEDING FRENZY
LOST IN AUSTIN
TRIPPIN'
IN THE MIX
MORE!
BEEN THERE

 

FRIDA

 «««« M

Review by Carlos E. Chávez

For anyone who didn’t believe that Salma Hayek could make the transformation into Frida Kahlo, the tortured Mexican painter and wife of Diego Rivera, the opening scene is a good indication to the contrary.

Hayek, fully dressed in traditional garb and complete with Kahlo’s unibrow and moustache, is being hauled out of her home lying in her four-poster bed by a gang of laborers down a flight of stairs, bed and all. Then, the story truly begins with flashbacks to her days in school.

Salma Hayek, who has been living in the States for more than a decade, has been making her way to a more recognized position in Hollywood, slowly breaking the film stereotype of the Mexican woman as domestic help.  Her intelligence and beauty along with her perseverance have been her formula for success in the competitive celluloid market. She has the ability to surround herself with the right people at the right time.

Eight years since acquiring the project, and a number of not so good movies, had to pass before Salma’s dream of playing such a complicated, creative, and surreal character would come true.

Frida was preceded by In the Time of the Butterflies where Salma portrayed a revolutionary from the Dominican Republic who was murdered along with her sisters in the early 60’s. This role cemented her position as a voice for strong Latin-American women.

Julie Taymor, the director of Titus and the Broadway version of The Lion King, was a definitive impact in the creative direction of the movie – her experience in religious and esoteric themes made her the prime candidate to translate the life of Kahlo, which in its truths, was almost too fantastic, surreal and devastating to be believed.  Colorful, dynamic, incendiary, full of tradition, yet contradictory in their approach, the scenes came quickly one after another, leaving us breathless, with a constant sense of anticipation, or even dread, of what would happen next.

Alfred Molina, who not only portrayed Diego Rivera but also interpreted almost by heart such a passionate life and way of thinking, couldn’t

have been a better choice for the role. Molina smoothly takes us to the interiors of the fiery, talented and idealistic mind of one of the most recognized muralists of the first half of the 20th Century.

Yet with Hayek, at times, it became noticeable for me, especially as a Mexican conscious of the difference in cultural strata, that her presentation could become too cute, and her vocal inflections were not characteristic of a woman of that period and upbringing who had suffered so much (although it is clear that every ounce of Hayek’s passion for this character and this performance went in to her transformation, and her effort is admirable).

To me, this film will remain a major piece of art full of strong visual imagery, excellent location scenery (parts of which - the trolley scene for example - were shot in my home town of San Luis Potosi), intense character studies which included Ashley Judd as Italian photographer Tina Modotti, Valeria Golino as Rivera’s ex –wife Lupe Marín, Antonio Banderas as the painter David Alfara Siquieros, and many more.  Vivid special effects only serve to further enhance Frida Kahlo’s art.   Also notable is the excellent musical performance of Mexican-American interpretative singer Lila Downs, who appeared frequently throughout the movie and added a great deal of folkloric authenticity to the film.  

FRIDA MOVIE Official Site

SALMA HAYEK Unofficial Site

LILA DOWNS Official Site (choose Espańol, English or Français)

 

 

Home ] Up ] BUZZMIX WHO? ] MUSIC ] RANT & RAVE! ] FEEDING FRENZY ] LOST IN AUSTIN ] TRIPPIN' ] IN THE MIX ] MORE! ] BEEN THERE ]

© 2002-2008 BuzzMix - A GardenOpus Publication.  All Rights Reserved.

Last Updated September 19, 2008